Google remains a bit of a “black box” when it comes to understanding how it ranks websites. But over the years many people have managed to devise certain principles that will help a page rank high in their SERPS. These principles aren’t hard and fast rules, but following them generally gives a page a chance to succeed. Well optimized pages tend to rank higher than ones that haven’t been touched. Let’s take a look at some of these core concepts of Google search engine optimization.

Effective basics

1) Google loves websites with many backlinks. Of course you can enter into the debate on whether Google loves quality or quantity when it comes to backlinks, but suffice it to say, backlinks are still a huge factor in Google. Most people recommend foregoing quantity in favor of “high-quality” links. This phrase is subject to interpretation, but to most people it means links from related pages. The older the domain holding the related page, the better. Quantity of links tends to be in the form of many unrelated links in footers and blog rolls. From what I’ve seen, both methods are still valid if followed with enthusiasm.

2) Careful on-page construction is a key to a high ranking. Most pros don’t overlook the careful construction of the on-page factors that lead to high rankings. On-page factors are something that webmasters have complete control over, so it’s definitely an area to consider. One nice thing about on-page optimization is that you can easily tweak the pages and experiment. There’s no good reason to ignore the obvious.

3) Google loves “authority.” In the last few years Google has become enthralled with the concept of “authority” and “trust” and has created a rather convoluted system to measure it. Once a website has been conferred authoritative and trusted, they seem to get a boost that helps lift even mediocre pages on their domain to a higher status. This is opposed to how it was several years back when Google would let each page fight it out on its own. The concept of authority and trust are well worth investigating if you’re looking to optimize your site for higher rankings.

4) Outgoing links. Not only are the links that point to you important, but so are the websites you point to. It’s easy to understand this concept as “the company you keep.” If you link to low quality resources and your website is linked to from low quality websites, Google could infer that your website is also low quality.

The progression of the years has seen Google’s algo get more sophisticated. But at its core the same essential principles that always applied still do apply. Your website is judged by a number of criteria that is not fully understood by anyone outside of Google. Based on continued observation, certain core principles have emerged. If you follow these principles, success will likely follow.

15. April 2009 · 1 comment · Categories: Google · Tags: ,

Google has a remarkable aspect to its algo these days. That’s the phenomena where a website either ranks for terms or it doesn’t. And we’re not talking about hardcore competitive terms, either. For lack of a better term, it looks like “Trustrank” comes into play when a website loses it’s rankings. First you need to check a few things.

1) Do you still have pages indexed in Google? If not, you’re likely banned. If the site command shows nothing, you have probably been dropped from their index.
2) Do you rank for your own unique domain name? If you don’t, you likely have incurred a penalty. It’s not severe enough to keep you completely out of the index, and can probably be fixed on its own.

But if you still rank for your own domain name and you have plenty of indexed pages and incoming links, the problems gets a bit murkier. Add in the fact you may even have “sitelinks” to your website and the situation is downright cloudy.

“Domain trust”, “authority,” and “TrustRank” are all concepts that explain away the symptoms, but with no official word from Google, it’s all speculation.

In any event, I witnessed this phenomena again on 4/8/2009. Something “removed the filter” from one of my websites and a massive amount of long tail traffic returned to the logs. By the 12th it was gone again.

To me that looked like Google did some testing of user data signals and shit-canned the results for further study. Of course it could be something unrelated. Since I’m not privy to Google’s internal thinking, I can simply guess.

I have to admit that “All or nothing” form or ranking certainly does appear Draconian.

31. January 2009 · 1 comment · Categories: Google · Tags:

Do a search in Google. Notice anything strange? I did for my results. Next to every single result is the ominous message “This site may harm your computer.”

This is happening on every page for every result.

Even the word “Help” turns up the same warning. HELP! It looks like I better be careful where I click, or I could end up in dire trouble.

What a scary place Google is today.

Adsense earnings for me have remained fairly steady in the last 3 or 4 months. In order to keep the money moving, I’ve had to work a bit harder and smarter then I used to in the past, but overall the efforts have kept me from going down too bad. Google announced results that indicated that overall their revenues are remaining decent. Compared to other advertising arenas, they’re still golden.

Continue reading “Adsense Earnings Hold Steady” »

I feel like I can finally put a nail in the coffin of cross-linking websites. Let me be specific, cross-linked, thematically unrelated links appear to push little or no value to other websites. In fact, it’s fair to say excessive cross-linking surely hurts in Yahoo and is very much devalued in Google. Google, as always, seems to be adding to the “don’t” list as far as linking goes.

I don’t really care about the fact cross-links aren’t working anymore. All it affects is the need for a more diverse link-profile for each website on your network. Sure, it’s a bit more work, but it’s a common sense approach you’ll need anyway. Plus, it certainly does look “less spammy” to not present visitors with a giant list of unrelated links on your sidebar or in your future. Of course this kills the business models of many blog networks, but that business model has been sucking wind for years anyway.

Now Google should go one step further and dismiss the “reciprocal link dump” type posts that are so prevalent in blogs. Blogs who are linking to each in a one-to-one relationship for gain get away with it if they do it in a faux “editorial” way.

In any event, another small loophole has been closed.

16. December 2008 · 1 comment · Categories: Google · Tags: ,

Google has been running the SearchWiki experiment for a few weeks now, and I haven’t been using it. There’s something about the idea of voting SERPs up and down that is quite sitting right with me. I also don’t see the purpose of commenting on SERPs.

I’m sure the reaction from your average web surfer is vastly different, but for me the idea behind this feature is a bit counter-intuitive. I understand why Google would want to incorporate common features like this, but this particular implementation is rife for abuse.

Google has already suggested they may use SearchWiki data to influence SERPs. If they do, you can expect manipulation quickly. It would be nothing for companies to set up “boiler rooms” of “raters” who go and push up their SERPs.

If Google uses it for statistical modeling, fine. Or if they use “massive demotions” to see if a website is crap for a further review, fine. But it just seems like one more place on the internet for people to leave unsolicited and unverified information about a websites.

It’s another one of those products where if people had to pay extra for the feature, they wouldn’t. If Google adds too many of these features to their listings, they’ll end up losing that simple sparse look and feel people are used to.

23. November 2008 · Comments Off · Categories: Google · Tags: ,

Whenever Google updates their rankings, it seems inevitable that some websites will drop in rankings. To the afflicted webmaster, the news couldn’t be more devastating. These drops in Google are becoming much more commonplace, especially for low PageRank websites. Let’s take a look at what could be causing such drops, and how they can be fixed.

The problem can be caused by an error on your part. There’s no reason to adopt the mindset that you couldn’t have made a mistake. We’re all humans, and it can happen to any of us at any time. At the same time, don’t naturally assume your drop in Google rankings is something you did. It might be a glitch. Google is very good at what they do, but not infallible. They can make a mistake also.

Continue reading “Google Rankings Drop – What To Do Next?” »

13. August 2008 · 2 comments · Categories: Google · Tags: ,

Nofollow was a stupid idea from the beginning, and I’m sure most webmasters would agree with that. It was intended to put a bandage on a gaping wound. Nofollow was invented in order to tell search engines “this link was probably spammed so don’t trust it.” It was meant to wipe out comment and forum spam. It hasn’t accomplished that task at all, and now he Nofollow tag has basically screwed up the flow of PageRank on the entire internet.

Continue reading “Nofollow Is Completely Misused” »

06. August 2008 · 2 comments · Categories: Google · Tags:

After seeing how much attention Cuil.com got for the launch of their basically shitty search engine, you realize just how much interest there would be in an alternative. I’m not sure what the numbers would translate into, but the target audience would be huge. People have been dealing with Google for years, and not all of them have had pleasant experiences, so they’re certainly ready to jump on the band wagon of anyone who comes along.

But frankly, Google’s success is for such a simple reason that people sometimes miss it. Google is so successful because their search engine generally finds the “right” results. Plus they do it often enough that people have become totally used to the system. Further, Google has tied all of us into so many sophisticated programs that their volume of traffic is just enormous. Could someone beat them? Theoretically, but they’ll have their work cut out for them. Besides, if Google realizes another company is making progress they’ll probably buy them out quickly.

Really, anyone who plans on beating Google has to do it by providing better results. And that’s going to be tough to do, especially when you consider that Google almost always:

  1. Provides very fresh results
  2. Does have most of the web indexed
  3. Provides generally relevant SERPs

The real key to their success is that they do this billions of times a month and rarely “choke” on a single search. They’re the undisputed leaders in scale and sophistication and any start-up is a long way away from catching up.

11. July 2008 · 3 comments · Categories: Google · Tags: ,

Google has done a bit of a “Google Dance” in the last 48 hours. A few of my websites which have been basically greatly reduced in traffic made a rip-snorting comeback. I’ve also noticed a few strange errors in Google Webmaster Tools that haven’t been there before. I’ve been expecting a relatively “big” update from Google for the last few weeks.

Google doesn’t “dance” in the way it did a few years ago, but there are periods of seismic shifting that happen every now and again. This seems to be one of those times. I suspect that Google is using more and more data from their personalization arsenal to help rank sites. I can’t prove it, but it would explain some of the types of changes I’m seeing.

It seems I’m in sync with Google these days, at least for the moment. I’ve been emphasizing content production all else for quite some time, and it seems to be paying off. Google is a fast system these days. It’s not uncommon for me to have traffic at my blogs within 5 seconds of publishing! That’s the type of response time I love.

I’m pretty sure we’ll be seeing a PR update soon, as well. It seems a spike in traffic tends to precede a PR update, so we’ll see if that theory holds true.

All in all, this latest Google update seems like it’s been kind to me. How about you?

Frankly, I’d say Google is doing a nice job these days. They seem to have placed a great emphasis on fresh content, and that’s useful for most surfers, IMHO. Comprehensiveness and freshness are the main reason Google always seems to retain their crown as Search King.