Google Claims That Click Fraud Is Very Low
December 13, 2006 – 10:58 amIf you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
Despite what others claim, Google thinks their click fraud rate is quite low. This subject is unlikely to be taken at face value, because of the nature of click fraud, and how integral fraud-checking would be to the core of Adsense system. Google knows how important the perception of low click-fraud rates is, so they went into great detail explaing to Andy Beal how they’ve arrived at figure of 2%. That would mean they company is, as is being claimed, “98% Click fraud free.”
Beal outlines the 4 levels of filtering that Google goes through:
Google utilizes four layers of click fraud detection. The first layer is purely automatic and is used to filter clicks from both “search” and AdSense partners (contextual ads). This filter is able to detect invalid clicks in real-time, with the goal of removing them before they ever show up in the AdWords console.
The second and third layers are aimed at filtering only AdSense clicks. The second layer is what Google calls its “flagging system” and is an automatic process to remove invalid clicks from the AdWords system. The third layer of filtering is a “manual review” process with more than two dozen Google employees manually reviewing and removing any suspicious clicks.
The final filter is Google runs an investigation into suspected click fraud accounts.
Donna Bogatin at ZDnet took a dim view of the post, and tends to think it was all marketing. It’s not a claim that is complete foreign to Google. In fact, subtle marketing seems to be one of their greatest strengths. The whole issue to Bogatin is what Google defines a “invalid clicks” and what they define as “valid clicks”. As with so many issue in Google, Google gets to define these terms with no input from others.
She mentions click fraud audits and wonders when we’ll see them. So far Yahoo and Google have both resisted efforts to allow anyone to audit their data. The trend is likely to continue. The issue of click fraud promises to get more and more interest everday. With Adwords on pace to do $10 billion in 2007, the confirmed 2% fraud rate already indicates that click fraud totals $200,000,000.00 alone at Google. The numbers MIGHT be even higher, depending on who you believe and what methodology people use to investigate the issue.
What do you think of this whole click fraud issue?
If you enjoyed this post, subscribe to the Sootle RSS feed!.



4 Responses to “Google Claims That Click Fraud Is Very Low”
Darren
I think Google has a bigger problem then they think they do or want to admit to.
No thats not right Goggles Advertisers have a bigger problem then they think they do.
Google doesn’t care about click fraud because they still get paid.
Google is coming up with the 2% figure.
The only people that know for sure is Google.
They can tell you anything they want.
They only tell their Advertisers that click fraud is very low to keep the advertisers from going somewhere else.
I got dropped for invalid clicks over a year ago and at that time I didn’t know what invalid clicks were.
After I got dropped I did a lot of research into it and learned that there are websites that promote invalid clicks.
Sites that say you click on my ads and I will click on yours.
Well what I found out was an ex employee that was mad at me listed my website at one of these sites and Google dropped me for invalid clicks.
When I tried to explain this to Google (Big Brother) they said sorry have a nice day.
There are 100’s of these kinds of sites doing 1000’s of clicks every hour.
Google could block the websites IP from making clicks but they don’t because they get paid my the click.
I see you are using Yahoo and not Google.
Why?
By Bill on Dec 14, 2006
Bill,
There’s no question you’re right. I was an original Adwords buyer who quit in 2005 because the ROI wasn’t that great. I felt that many of the clicks were invalid.
I think this whole click fraud issue is the single biggest one facing Google, but they’ll have to do a better job actually explaining what they do to prevent it.
The reason I use YPN on Sootle is because Adsense doesn’t run. The code shows a blank space where the ads are supposed to be, indicating a ban from Adsense. Why this would be I never found out. The website was never in Adsense, but is banned.
By Darren McLaughlin on Dec 15, 2006
Darren,
I can’t find any way on any of your sites to contact you so I will ask you my new question here.
I went to google site maps yesterday to see if there were any problems.
I clicked on one of my sites that is listed there and it took me a summary page.
on that page there is a line that says:
URLs restricted by robots.txt
when I click on that I get a page with 8 pages that look like this:
http://www.protect-your-eyesight.com/c…l=http://erotis.svel.ru/foto/index.html
I have no idea what these are.
Do you have any idea where Googel came up with these pages? and why?
What are URLs restricted by rebots.txt?
Are they hurting my site?
Thanks
By Bill on Dec 15, 2006
Bill,
You actually have a robots file installed here
In it, Google is being told to:
Disallow: /cgi-bin/
Disallow: /bin/
That means that it won’t follow any link in your website that contains the string “/cgi-bin/” in it. Those URLs are restricted by that rule.
Darren
By Darren McLaughlin on Dec 15, 2006